Monday, 13 February 2012

As the Flames Rose We Danced to the Sirens, the Sirens

Drawn by the Spanish element of the Sleepwalk Collective, I went to see As the Flames Rose Ee Danced to the Sirens, the Sirens.

Apart from my usual proviso of 'coulda cut 15 minutes' I loved its energy, use of music, microphone, darkness/spotlights and film. It felt very fresh, more theatre than live literature but ultimately a spoken word, stream of consciousness performance. A sequence of small actions in a large black-box stage.

Fave bits:
1. After a brief intro she pulled the mic up her body, accompanied by a v loud soundtrack: starting at the ankle, along the ripping of her leg, an oceanic stomach, thudding heart with poppy love song, to the silence of her head. Very affecting, mapping a new physicality.
2. Sitting in the circle of a train track she demonstrates how various people in various situations might drink a glass of wine: a man wanting to seduce a woman, like this... a woman wanting to forget everything, like this... a solider taking his final drink, like this...
3. In between these scenarios she decribes extreme deaths of people or herself - falling from a window, as part of a 'edgy experimental' performance, in the middle of an ocean, over the top joke deaths...
4. She sets a small train running, steps out of the track circle, ties her hands together and poses to scream delicately (as in 1930 b-movies). Screams again. The train circles around her. Then she falls over, screams to be silenced by the train running into her mouth.
5. Sets a film running, light screened onto black curtains, lies in front of it, and feeds a camera down her throat - get the muscular tongue, wetness on the screen as a recording talks about how she is viewed...
6. Walks away from film, into darkness. Switches on an underlight, so her face is distorted. Describes and enacts scenes (just with minimal facial expressions) from a Greta Garbo film, close up, underlit. Sort of funny, sort of sad.
7. Offers herself to the audience, we can do anything to her, kiss her, touch her, we have a minute to go up to her. The audience shuffles.
8. Declares she wants to fall into an image. Sets the film running again. This time it's a loop of a b/w film of a woman discovering the dead body of a man, swooning, to be supported by another man. She dances in front of the screen, so we have her enormous silhouette projected on the screen and the film projected on to her. Beautiful movement, repetition. Mesmerising

After which everything seemed a bit pale.

Throughout, though I loved its humour, playfulness, intimacy, earnestness, her presence, the self-awareness / self-mockery without being pretentious.

They're performing again in June in Harrogate (of all places).

Monday, 6 February 2012

Of Whales

It took me four months to read Moby Dick – for the first time last summer - and I felt energised by the experience to pick up Of Whales in print, in paint, in sea, in stars, in coin, in house, in margins by Antony Caleshu.



Anthony Caleshu has recreated the tangled, obsessive and fascinating story. Or a story, at least. As well as Moby Dick, Caleshu uses Melville’s letters, sources and criticism to create this excavation of obsession, of creation, of storytelling and fantasy. As he extracts in ‘Wonderfullest Thing’ (a poem of lines from the novel), “Each chapter is another chapter…”. And in this book, each poem is another poem, the tangents, enthusiasms, and knowledge diverge, echo and ultimately stack up to make a compulsive response to the original Whale.



One of my favourite themes from the original novel, Caleshu returns to, is Melville’s preoccupation with how whales are represented elsewhere. Caleshu has several poems discussing the art of whales, unpacking their contents, imagining relationships and hamming up new stories from them:



“The dialectical struck us: portrait or landscape? fish or fishmonger? In the white and green, we could see all of our dreams.” (‘A Very-Large Oil-Painting, Thoroughly Besmoked’)



“anachronistic… the time: post-war, post-apocalyptic, post-whale” there is time travel a-plenty here, both in Caleshu’s recasting of himself as a confidente to the Melville family (there are letters between himself and Maria and Augusta Melville, from 1850), and also in the linguistical play and references (Pulp, ACE grants and The Writers’ Room photography series from The Guardian all stand out).



“It’s the first night in a week of nights that we haven’t had any

                                          Herman between us.

Not even a letter to his mother.



But now I’m remembering his mother’s letters to him,

and to me, to whom she was always good to write.”

(‘How I Met Your Mother (with the Help of Melville’s)’)



And so, like with my reading of the novel, I became dizzy to where I stood in relation to events, fuzzy around the edges of reason and rationale. A position I like, that reminds me of being at sea, at staring too long at an empty horizon, too long without landed references and familiarity.



The contemporary letters are joined by Caleshu taking the role of Captain Caleshu, addressing his son Ishmael Caleshu on his 18th birthday. This sequence of five prose piece dances between a touching discourse between father and son, a pastiche of seaman talk, a homage to all things absurdist and a dalliance with a stream of conscious confessional that leaves us hanging onto an open end, as if the speaker has just slipped his mooring and is out of earshot.



“The passage I just read to you is not from the Oxford Book, but I think you’ll agree that it is engrossing nonetheless. There is nothing so elemental as water. Water has no past prejudices.” (“’What makes thee want to go a whaling, eh?’”)



It works, as the rest of the book works (for me, at least) – best when I don’t focus too much on meaning, but cock my head at sense and tone, letting odd sentences latch into memory, but on the whole leave it sloshing a sense of regret, aspiration, hope, love and uncertainty.



If the collection was made of such play, I might struggle to engage with its continual joking, the effect of which being masking, diffidence and remoteness. But it isn’t. Poems such as ‘The Making of Ahab’, are far more logical, or perhaps coherent in how they flow forwards from the first descriptive couplet of absence through how Melville’s novel is as much about the white space as a poem, to the revelations of the potency, fury and frustration of the captain, both in the novel and to the reader.



“None of us on board have any reason to question



the nature of the voyage, when all of a sudden

the whiteness of a blank page



rises up from beneath –

the author’s quick turn …”



The sense of inevitability in this poem is tragic, and mostly unsaid, as the lines become shorter and shorter, leaving more and more white – again the vast sea, perhaps?



This poem ends with a “we” – the reader, the crew, all of us… Elsewhere I enjoyed this communal narrator was in the farce, ‘Moby-Dick: The Film’ (there is also reference to a musical). Where the we seems to be the directors, the film crew, the actors, all struggling to make a film that attempts to be more faithful than previous but feels more like Eric Sykes or Tony Hancock are involved than Richard Attenborough.



                  “The director’s head is firmly in his hands when someone

                                                accidently triggers the whirlpool.”



Perhaps it is impossible to make a film faithful to such a book, just as Caleshu could well be “await[ing] technical corrections” to this book.



Although while it has this jokey, throwaway tone that keeps resurfacing in poems, each are clearly carefully crafted in their balance of tenderness, folly, research and personal experience. It took me several sittings to be able to step back from piecing the poems together, from relating them to incidents in the novel to slip into the eddy that is obsession, spiralling round and round the Whale, whales, Melville and what it means to create – relationships, art, literature. Once there, I didn’t want to leave. The collection is a great achievement, a great honouring of an obsessive book, and offered me a new perspective on the novel, acting as first mate rather than a sequel.









 

Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Burns Baby Burns

A double dosage of activity for Burns' Night this year:

In person (alongside Steve Lewis) I was performing at the Hepworth Gallery in Wakefield, in gallery 5 (see right for our stage set). Which I absolutely loved - the gallery itself, right on bank of the River Calder was wonderful, both the building and its contents. Windows overlook the weir, a rush of thick glassy water that is completely silent from inside the building, and yet totally influences it, thorugh light, a slow moving dynamism and the send of transience. All of which is in evidence in Hepworth's sculptures.

The night was organised by Andrew McMillan, and he'd picked the perfect Gallery five for our seaside set. The sculptures behind us, being like huge flotsam, beachy creatures and the piece at the back a upended hull, so adding an extra dimension to the poems (apparently). Just before we went on Steve pointed out a quote from Hepworth saying that when she was making the aperatures (in wire mesh) for her bronze scultpures she felt as though she were creating a boat...

We were only one set of performers. Also enjoying the crazy acoustics of the gargantuan galleries were Helen Mort, Max Wallis, David Tait, Rommi Smith and the Leeds Young Authors.

Further north, in Dumfries, a poem of mine, 'Hammock', was featured on a window pane, in memory of how Burns used to etch his poems on windows. Windows for Burns Night is an inspired project to be a part of. I was joining many many others, including Jen Hadfield, Jean Sprackland, Tom Pow, Anne Caldwell, Jean Atkin, Jo Bell, Kim Moore and many many more...







Sunday, 22 January 2012

Whistle

Martin Figura's Whistle was part of the Wordsworth Trust's Art and Books Festival this weekend. I am so glad I made the effort, through heavy rain in the dark, to get up there to see him perform this show.

It is a story of his mother’s death at the hands of his father when he was nine years old. Told, reviews said, in an uplifting and restrained manner.

Martin stays stationary throughout the show, using slides to provide the visual element. And someone has had great fun making up the slides. Figura is a photographer, so I presume he had some input. They use old family photos, cartoons, pictures also of memorabilia and magazines to recreate the time period, provide something other than Martin to look at (which he agreed was a good thing - for both the audience and him!). Sometimes it felt as though they were a bit too flippant (cartoon creatures added to the photos, for example), played for easy laughs, as very occasionally the text also did - "I'll protect their [an uncle and aunt] identity by giving them false names" ran one intro before revealing their true (maybe) first and surnames. And the performance really didn't need these add-ons of humour. His manner is so charming and the horror played so straight, I smiled just at the boyhood perspective and prioritisations.

The voices: poetic and narrative (as in the book, poems are interspersed with prose) are distinct and I enjoyed the variation between the two. There is an awful lot of material for him to get through, not a lot of pausing or space between the episodes, so the rip-roaring energy created by the differing rhythms helped [my] concentration. I would have liked more space though, to allow us fully to register the emotional impact of what was being said, add our own imaginative responses as the story unfolded. Thankfully Figura doesn't dictate.

The third voice is that of his mother - reading letters written to her father during courtship and as the relationship unravels. Introduced as a scouser, I was initally surprised she didn't have a stronger scouse accent, but this perhaps was a 'good thing', removing easy catagorisation. And maybe the mother didn't have one. What I struggled with was her monotone delivery (also quite fast). Whether she was declaring love or protesting at his withdrawal she sounded the same. A missed opportunity for me for some subtle drama.

And so the horrific incident is revealed, or not - as the boy didn't witness it, carted off by the authority of adults. Adults who are by turns distraught, dealing with their own grief, then saviours (a remarkable neighbour). The boy Martin takes in his stride, as child are wont to, moving between Benedictan boarding school to orphange, becoming more concerned with dealing with the rules of various institutions, while visiting his father, separated from sisters. A gripping story, yes. And carefully, senstively handled. Boundaries clearly defined between father and his teenage son.

I just wished it had stopped earlier. Moving into adulthood (including wedding photos) meant a loss of focus for me. And I wasn't really sure why, what this 'proof' of his current happiness proved - a belief in marraige, despite everything? - the comparison of two generations of weddings? - The fact he was standing there, delivering this beautifully redemptive story, was proof enough of his survival, compassion and understanding.


As a piece of live literature I think it'll (and porbably has done already) act powerfully in the service of poetry. It was shortlisted for the Ted Hughes Prize for New Poetry, which has that ethic at its heart. I can imagine people coming for the story - what a draw - and witnessing the power of economy and restraint that poetry offers. Figura used few metaphors or rich language. It is perhaps unnecessary to embellish such a story with them. Ultimately it is the remarkable spirit of a boy and how his adult self relates to him that makes this piece of literature so worthwhile.

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

The Buddha would Have Something to Say ...













Low clouds all day, making visibility less than three miles. Intermittent mizzle. That sly cold that stiffens fingers. Mud.

All creating this at the day's end.

Monday, 2 January 2012

Chainsaws: when to use them and when not

Inspired by Dave Hartley's amazing list of achievements for 2011 on his blog, I thought I'd consider mine.

The condensed version (ie, my top two):
I survived four weeks on retreat at Hawthornden Castle, which, during week three seemed extremely unlikely, and yet managed to come away with a whole stack of rough drafts which have formed the basis of the year's hothousing/incubation period.

I learnt to use a chainsaw. Fortunately this was after the month at Hawthornden (otherwise there might have been bloodshed). I have yet to decide which I find more scary: sawing the wood myself or supporting the wood on the sawbench as someone else welds the machine. I can't seem to rid my imagination (when the machine first starts) of visions of deep thigh cuts or the saw kicking back to slice my head in half.

Tenacity underpins both. Maybe the wind's getting to me.

Self-Pity
I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself.
A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough
without ever having felt sorry for itself.
                                                    DHLawrence